I was getting a JSP compilation problem that I could not solve.

org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
        at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.handleJspException(JspServletWrapper.java:510)
        at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:375)
        at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:314)
        at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:264)

org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
        at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java:572)
        at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:303)

java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "${status.index}"
        at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
        at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:447)
        at java.lang.Integer.valueOf(Integer.java:553)
        at org.apache.jasper.compiler.JspUtil.coerceToInt(JspUtil.java:752)
        at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Generator$GenerateVisitor.convertString(Generator.java:2949)

The major problem was this was happening on the server but not locally.  The compilation problem was occurring for this line.

<uportal:module definition="${module}" moduleIndex="${status.index}"/>

The moduleIndex value is “${status.index}”. Locally when the JSP compiler encounters this it knows to call my setter for moduleIndex that takes a String parameter. But on the server the JSP compiler seemed to insist on using the setter for moduleIndex that takes an integer parameter, hence the compilation problem.

I finally posted on the Sun Forums and with the help of evnafets I came up with two solutions.

1. The correct solution is to upgrade my application to use JSTL 1.1.  Then the JSTL expressions such as “${status.index}” will be evaluated by the container.  Then I don’t have to have a setter that takes a String parameter, the JSTL expression, and evaluate it myself.  I can just use a setter that takes an integer parameter.
2. The quick, hack solution which is to get rid of the setter that takes an integer parameter.  Wherever the application passes in an integer parameter, I change it to pass in a String representation of that integer.